THE PURPOSE OF THIS BLOG


This blog was established to help get to the bottom of how the Collins & Bone Partnership reached the very sad situation it is now in, with its partner Liam James Collins having a bankruptcy hearing on 25th January (postponed)15th March 2012 (ditto), and finally bankrupted on 9th May 2012 (case # NEWC 1517 of 2011 BKT 3472187, Newcastle County Court, The Law Courts, The Quayside, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 3LA), and David Bone Jnr declared bankrupt on 31st May (case no 100 of 2012 Wigan County Court). The partnership used the following addresses:

25 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London, WC2 H9HW, UK

Eastern Villa, Station Rd. North, Forest Hall, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE12 9AE (owned by Liam Collin's parents, and now up for sale)

There are 3 specific goals of this blog:

• To find out what happened to the 1m+ GBP monies that C&B raised via PNs in late 2009, 2010 & 2011. I am excluding PNs issued to ex-CBS investors, but that said, this blog will be of interest to ex-CBS investors, and there is information that needs to be obtained from this set of investors wrt when PNs were issued to them, and their duration.

• To determine what, if any, criminal charges should be brought against the partners.

• To warn other investors off doing any business with the partners, their equally inept/unscrupulous extended family members, and supportive cohorts.

When you look at the PNs, there are no specific statements on the documents that specify how the monies were to be used - how you believed they were to be used is based on whatever e-mail/phone call foreplay you had beforehand with Liam Collins. That is why it is so important that the following information is collated for this category of C&B investors on an individual basis:

1) What did you believe you were investing in, and what was your basis for believing this?
2) What investment risks were you informed of?
3) What was your understanding of the purpose to which PN monies could be put?
4) What brochures and documents were you furnished with as prt of your due diligence?
5) What due diligence did you do?
This blog is being operated completely separate to Sally & Jasmine's blog (http://collins-bone-investors.blogspot.com), although we share the common goal of getting to the bottom of this mess in a professional manner. If you don't want to post anything on the blog in person, you can send an e-mail to me at lastdoghome@gmail.com - information conveyed in any such e-mails will only be posted on the blog on your behalf after any editting/your specific consent.


Ewart (The Editor)



Thursday 15 November 2012

OR escalates partnership investigation

The preliminary investigation of the Collins & Bone Partnership performed by Martin Faulkner of the Official Receivers Office is now complete. The long awaited decision has now been made that a more thorough investigation of the partnership is required by a separate team. Martin Faulkner is not a member of this team, and as such he ceases to be the Official Receiver for the Collins & Bone Partnership. All information previously supplied to/gathered by Martin Faulkner has however been passed onto this team. Given the wide readership of the IFS blog and this blog by investors, the Official Receivers Office has requested that their respective editors post the following texts on their blogs to help update investors on the current state of play.

The Editor



"Update to creditors concerning the bankruptcies of Liam James Collins (Newcastle Upon Tyne County Court No. 1517 of 2011) and David James Robert Bone (Wigan County Court No. 100 of 2012).

Please be aware that enquiries in these matters are now being conducted by the Official Receiver’s Public Interest Unit (PIU) North, 2nd Floor, 3 Piccadilly Place, London Road, Manchester M1 3BN.

Any previous correspondence forwarded by creditors to the Official Receiver’s in Liverpool has also been transferred to PIU.

It is the Official Receiver’s intention to contact all creditors shortly requesting further information to assist the ongoing enquiries.

The continuing assistance of creditors in these matters is greatly appreciated."



Friday 21 September 2012

Patrick Collins - part II

Patrick Collins was not happy with the blog article I posted on him on 28/8/2012, and so sent in the e-mail below, to which I have added bold "[The Editor]" comments.  The original quotes from the previous post are in red. I am quite prepared to update the 28/08/2012 blog article in due course if more information is made available, but the blog article as it stands is an accurate reflection of the e-mails we exchanged at the time. I would have preferred not to have posted this response to Patrick Collins' e-mail as a blog article, but e-mail sent to info@patproperties.co.uk gets rejected with "Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full)".

The Editor


On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:07 PM, <info@patproperties.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr Tempest,

I have recently read your blog for the first time. With relation to your blog of 26th August about me, I would kindly ask you to review some comments that you have made about me and question them. I was happy to give you honest answers and expected you to write an honest report; this has not been the case.

(1)So Patrick Collins LIED when he said he never had any dealings with Novocastria

At no point did I lie to you throughout any of the questions you asked me. I would not clarify handing over a property for management to another agency as having dealings with them as in your example of 2 Dronfield Road. In your own words;


[The Editor]: The handing off of C&B owned properties that had a steady revenue stream all the way through to July 2012 to Novocastria Lettings constitutes dealings - it required interactions between you and Novocastria Lettings to make it happen  If it didn't, then how on earth were the management company switches effected?

According to the IFS blog entry http://collins-bone-investors.blogspot.ca/search?updated-max=2012-05-08T14:05:00%2B01:00&max-results=10&start=10&by-date=false, the account of Dom Smith's daughters rental of 2 Dronfield Rd., Salford clearly states that your involvement with this property was up until end November, not October 2011 as you have alluded to below. Please clarify.

Moreover, Dom Smith's daughters are, as far as I am aware, still awaiting their rental deposits back, which runs counter to you statement to me that "There are no deposits owed to any Collins and Bone tenants who rented through Patrick Properties". Please provide your comments to Dom Smith's account, and what happened to his daughters' deposits.


'Tenancy Agreement for 41 Albert Road; Moreover, within 24 hours of me bringing this to his attention, Internet searches for the above four mentioned rental agreements no longer showed up, which is clearly not a coincidence and perhaps an indicator that Patrick Collins has something to hide'

As I stated this was an honest mistake as throughout this month there were over 300 different tenants moving in to properties and the staff were under a huge amount of pressure. I have had no dealings with the properties not showing up, nor do I know who has had dealings with this. I would kindly you asking you not to accuse me of having something to hide, as when you asked me the questions, I clearly answered them to you.

[The Editor]: When rental agreements have readily appeared on Internet searches over a period of many, many months (we're talking at least the past 6 months), and within 24 hrs of you being sent the link to one of them the searches disappear, that is no coincidence. I'll leave others to draw their own conclusions. I'm sorry if you don't like the conclusion I drew.


(2) who was collecting the rental monies from these properties if not him, he simply stated:
" I can not advise who has been managing the property since then."

That, quite frankly, just will not do!

As I was no longer managing the properties from October 2011 onwards, I had no idea who was dealing with the rents. it is not a case of not remembering, as you have quoted, but more of a case of not dealing with this properties anymore and so not having a role in the management of them.


[The Editor]: Are you seriously telling me that you did not know that Novocastria Lettings took over management of, say,  2 Dronfield Rd. in November 2011 from Patrick Properties Management Ltd.?


(3) It strikes me as rather suspicious that after managing C&B properties for nearly 9 months, Patrick Collins formed a limited company only to stop business one year later with debts - one could be forgiven for thinking that the sole motive for forming Patrick Properties Management Ltd was to bury debt

The company was trading for over a year before it became a limited company. As the company grew I was advised that it would make sense to become a limited company. The company grew on the premises that we were very good at managing Properties, and the downfall of the company began when becoming involved with Collins Bone Properties etc. At no stage was the company created to 'bury debt'.


[The Editor]: In previous e-mail exchanges with you you indicated that your involvement with C&B properties was for a 1 year period spanning December 2009 through to December 2010. Given that your Ltd company was formed in September 2010, please explain the above statement because the timelines simply don't marry-up.


I would kindly ask you to edit these details, or ask further questions instead of write incorrect details that could be classed as slander.

[The Editor]: I had asked you a number of questions, but you declined to answer them on the basis that this would require time & effort on your part to delve into your records, something that you would require payment for, and which I am most certainly not prepared to do. If you are now prepared to answer these additional questions, then all well and good. The following questions are outstanding:


  • You made the statement that your involvement with C&B owned properties terminated circa December 2010. So why are there rental agreements arranged by you for C&B owned properties in June/July 2011?
  • When the management of 2 Dronfield Rd. was handed over by you to Novocastria Lettings ala Dom Smith's account, who were your discussions with at Novocastria, and into what bank account were the rental deposits transferred? You have made the statement to me previously that "There are no deposits owed to any Collins and Bone tenants who rented through Patrick Properties", so these deposits had to have been transferred.
  • Since the posting of my blog article on you, a number of landlords who previously had their properties managed by you have been in touch claiming that they are either owed rent by you, and/or have otherwise not had rental deposits paid back to tenants. You had made a previous statement to me that no rental deposits are owed to Collins and Bone tenants. Is this also true for all other landlords? I'll be happy to put you in touch with these landlord(s) assuming that they agree to my doing so.
  • I have supplied you previously with a list of C&B owned properties, and asked you to comment on which of these properties you managed, and when. You replied:


"All of those properties were managed by me at some stage but i'm not sure what dates they were handed over as it was constantly changing."


Why was the management company for any given C&B owned property constantly being changed, and who was orchestrating these changes, and for what reasons? David Bone Jnr? Liam Collins?


Kind Regards

Patrick Collins

Monday 27 August 2012

Mark Black

I have updated the blog entry with responses to some of the questions raised with Mark Black below.

Mark Black has refused to answer any further questions until such a time as all mention of him is removed from the blog, which is something that the Editor is quite prepared to do once once answers to basic questions have been provided that indicate he is no longer a person of interest. Mark Black's approach differs markedly with that of Abode Lettings & Property Management which was also part of the "INVESTOR ALERT - avoid these characters" blog article, but whose directors, Justin Turner & Nasser Moffat, answered all questions posed and had themselves removed.

There are some very important questions that Mark Black has refused to answer. The claim he has made is that the Collins & Bone Partnership were paid for rental of all their properties whilst they were managed by Novocastria Lettings, a direct contradiction to a statement made by Liam Collins. So, clearly, someone is lying. The matter will now be turned over to the Official Receiver.

The Editor



[ewart, 27/8/2012]: What was the relationship between Novocastria Lettings & Novocastria Developments Ltd.? There were bi-directional linkages between your respective web-sites.

[Mark Black, 30/8/2012]: Novocastria Lettings was simply a brand name to manage the two sets of properties under. I managed the C&G houses whilst Rachael Bone, with Davey's input, managed the Collins Bone houses. It served no-one any purpose to have either set of houses sitting empty.

Novocastria Developments Ltd was a company set up for the Lyons Fund, and when that collapsed it was left dormant. Novocastria developments never traded. I tried to pursue the C&G model under the Novocastria Developments branding briefly but you, Sally and Jasmine were quick to claim all manner of nonsense about it so I discontinued that effort. For the record - it had nothing to do with Liam or Davey; but again you never bothered to call and just jumped to an incorrect conclusion.

Given that the C&G properties had to be managed, and I wanted to do what I could to help the C&G investors, it was convenient to use the branding work that had been done for Novocastria rather than waste time re-doing it. I didn't want to leave any C&G investor with an unmanaged property so it was a vehicle to meet those obligations. As there was little point in incurring two sets of fees the same feeds to Rightmove etc were used to market Collins Bone properties. Rachael dealt with all C&B houses.

[ewart, 27/8/2012]: The set of C&B owned properties are listed in the "COLLINS & BONE HOUSES AND NOVOCASTRIA LETTINGS" article posted 22nd February 2012. For each of these properties, during what time periods did Novocastria Lettings/Novocastria Developments Ltd manage these properties, and for what time periods were these properties actually rented out?

[Mark Black, 30/8/2012]: As above. Novocastria was simply a marketing vehicle. Effectively the Collins Bone portfolio was run by Rachael and Davey. I didn't handle any of it so don't have data on it.

[ewart, 27/8/2012]: Novocastria Lettings charged a management fee for properties that it successfully let to cover advertising & maintenance costs, and this came out of the rental monies collected - the rest of the monies went to the landlords ... at least that is what should have happened. Why did this not happen for C&B owned properties?

[Mark Black, 30/8/2012]: As above. Novocastria didn't charge C&B as such. Novocastria didn't make any money from the C&B portfolio as it was handled separately.

[ewart, 27/8/2012]: If Novocastria Lettings/Novocastria Developments Ltd did indeed make payments to C&B/the partners,:
  • When were these payments made?
  • From what bank account were the payments made?
  • What were the payments for?
  • How were they tagged/labelled on bank statements?
  • How were the payments made? If transferred directly Into bank account(s), what are the details for each account?
[Mark Black, 30/8/2012]: Money from Collins Bone was Liam and Davey's business. Any money coming into Novocastria was handled by Rachael and went immediately to CollinsBone. Beyond that I can't say as it wasn't much to do with the C&G houses. Equally, Liam and Davey wouldn't be able to comment much on the management of old C&G houses as it didn't concern them.

I don't have an awful amount of time to spend on this unfortunately - certainly not for someone who takes blind pops at me online. Hope this helps.

[ewart, 30/8/2012]: If Novocastria Lettings is not part of Novocastria Developments Ltd., who is responsible for filing the tax returns for business done under the Novocastria Lettings umbrella? Is it:

        a) you/Dave Bone Snr, for C&G investor owned properties?
        b) David Bone Jnr & Rachael Bone for C&B owned properties?

If the answers to a) & b) above are both yes, then what you are inferring is that the written statement made by Liam Collins to me on 23/2/2012 wrt C&B never receiving any monies from Novocastria was incorrect.

        Question unanswered

[ewart, 30/8/2012]: Against ,what business entities or persons are rental monies from a) & b) above (to be) filed?

         Question unanswered

[ewart, 30/8/2012]: Were rental monies, as well as rental deposits, collected from C&B owned and C&G investor owned properties kept separate at all times?

         Question unanswered

[ewart, 30/8/2012]: What is an operational e-mail address and phone # through which Rachael Bone/Davey can be contacted?

         Question unanswered

[ewart, 30/8/2012]: David Bone Snr was a fellow director at Novocastria Development Ltd, and resigned 17/4/2012. Presumably both you and he were responsible for C&G investor owned properties, and never had any dealing with C&B owned properties, is that correct? If so, how do you explain David Bone Snr having a role in the management of 2 Dronfield
Rd. (see article http://collins-bone-investors.blogspot.ca/search?updated-max=2012-05-08T14:05:00%2B01:00&max-results=10&start=10&by-date=false) which is C&B owned?
         Question unanswered
 
 
From: The Editor
Date: Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:22 AM
Subject: e-mail to Mark Black
To: Mark Black via Adavo Property web-site e-mail portal

Mr. Black,

In response to the IFS blog's "ANOTHER COBOCO MORPH" article (13th August 2012), you wrote in and made the following comments:

"You, like anyone else, have been at your liberty to contact me at any point in the last few years and haven't. Why you haven't contacted me directly remains a mystery;"
.
.
"Please leave me to support my family and stop these hurtful and ill informed posts or alternatively pick up the phone and call."

On 23rd February 2012 I sent an e-mail, copy below, to all of Rachael Bone, Liam Collins, David Bone Jnr, and also submitted through the e-mail portals on the Novocastria Lettings and Novocastria Developments Ltd respective web-sites. There was no reply from any of you! The e-mail was triggered by:
  • An e-mail from Liam Collins the same day in which he states:
"I get nothing at all from them (Novocastria Lettings) ever as they are running at a loss most months.".
  • A phone call I had with Rachael Bone earlier on the same day in which she refused to answer even the most basic questions such as:
  • What is your role at Novocastria Lettings?
  • What is the relationship between Novocastria Lettings & Novocastria Developments?
  • Why is Novocastria Lettings not paying any monies for C&B owned properties that it lets? This includes 36 Langhorn Close, which was the business address used by Novovastria Lettings.
Novocastria Lettings was one of a number of lettings agencies that managed Collins & Bone Partnership (C&B) owned properties. The following questions need to be answered, and given that you are a director of Novovastria Developments Ltd, coupled with the statements you posted on the IFS blog, you should have no objections to answering them, or referring me to someone who will:
  • What was the relationship between Novocastria Lettings & Novocastria Developments Ltd.? There were bi-directional linkages between your respective web-sites.
  • The set of C&B owned properties are listed in the "COLLINS & BONE HOUSES AND NOVOCASTRIA LETTINGS" article posted 22nd February 2012. For each of these properties, during what time periods did Novocastria Lettings/Novocastria Developments Ltd manage these properties, and for what time periods were these properties actually rented out?
  • Novocastria Lettings charged a management fee for properties that it successfully let to cover advertising & maintenance costs, and this came out of the rental monies collected - the rest of the monies went to the landlords ... at least that is what should have happened. Why did this not happen for C&B owned properties?
  • If Novocastria Lettings/Novocastria Developments Ltd did indeed make payments to C&B/the partners,:
  • When were these payments made?
  • From what bank account were the payments made?
  • What were the payments for?
  • How were they tagged/labelled on bank statements?
  • How were the payments made? If transferred directly Into bank account(s), what are the details for each account?

Ewart


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ewart tempest <ewart.tempest@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:27 AM
Subject: Novocastria Lettings questions
To: davidbone@castleandgatehouse.co.uk, Rachael <rachael@collinsandbone.com>, Rachael Bone <rachaelbone@castleandgatehouse.com>
Cc: ewart tempest <ewart.tempest@gmail.com>, Liam Collins <liam@collinsandbone.com>


David,

I phoned Novocastria Lettings this morning and got Rachael on the line - she referred me to you for all questions, not even preparing to answer what kind of a company Novocastria Lettings was (Ltd, LLP, partnership, let alone who the directors/partners are). The following questions need to be answered:

What kind of a company is Novocastria Lettings (Ltd, LLP, partnership)?
Answer:

When was Novocastria Lettings founded?
Answer:

When did Novocastria Lettings start managing the rental of C&B assets?
Answer:
What company had responsibility for managing the rental of C&B assets prior to Novocastria Lettings?
Answer:

Why is Novocastria Lettings using the address of one of these C&B assets (36 Langhorn Close, Newcastle-upon-Tyne) as its business address? Does it physically occupy these premises?
Answer:

Where does the money to renovate/manage these C&B assets come from?
Answer:

If the answer to the previous question is (in part) C&B, how much money did C&B pay the company(ies) responsible for managing the rental of C&B assets in each of 2010 and 2011?
Answer:

How much money have the company(ies) responsible for managing the rental of C&B assets paid back to C&B in each of 2010 and 2011?
Answer:

What is the value of the rental income that C&B properties have generated in each of 2010 and 2011?
Answer:

Ewart

Sunday 26 August 2012

Patrick Collins - part I

If readers of this article find anything contradictory in what Patrick Collins has stated given their own experiences working with this individual/Patrick Properties Management Limited, please get in touch with the Editor.

Now that both partners have been made bankrupt, the emphasis has moved to:
  • The filing of alleged charges against the partners with Martin Faulkner, the Official Receiver.
  • The continued mining and supplying of information to assist the authorities in bringing this fiasco to a conclusion as fast as possible..
  • Closely monitoring of the ongoing Official Receiver's investigation.
If you have any information on the partners that may be useful to the Official Receiver's investigation, please send this to Martin Faulkner, or contact myself/the IFS blog if you prefer. And if you feel that you have been wronged in any way by the partners, then you really should be thinking carefully about filing alleged charges with Martin Faulkner if you have not already done so.

In terms of finding out where the monies have gone, an obvious place to start are rental monies. It should also be one of the easier sources of revenue flow to track as the C&B property assets are known. What follows below is information supplied by Patrick Collins of Patrick Properties Management Ltd. - his was one of a number of companies that let C&B owned properties.

Patrick Properties Management Ltd
Company # 7365820
Date of incorporation: 3/9/2010
Petition to wind up: 14/05/2012
Order to wind up: 10/07/2012
Official Receiver:
Gary Owen,
The Official Receiver,
1st Floor,
Melbourne House,
Pandon Babnk,
Newcastle Upon Tyne,
NE1 2JQ

Tel. 0191-260-4600
E-mail: gary.owen@insolvency.gsi.gov.uk

Patrick Collins confirmed the following with Editor in a sequence of recent e-mail exchanges:

  • Patrick Properties supposedly acted as a letting agency for the Collins Bone partnership for a period of a year, from approximately December 2009 to December 2010, although this does not gel with signed assured shorthold tenancy agreements found on the Internet (see later). Rent was always paid to landlords monthly minus the management fees charged. He could not give the details of the properties due to data protection act, but I pointed out to him that the list of properties that the Collins & Bone Partnership own has been made publicly available by the partners, and an earlier copy of these assets posted @ www.collins-and-bone.blogspot.com "C&B assets - negative equity" article. So the addresses of these properties are not an issue for the Data Protection Act - they are well known to all C&B investors. He offered to identify the C&B properties that he managed, but on being presented the list although he confirmed that all the properties had been managed by him at some stage, he could not remember the dates when the various properties were handed over as it was constantly changing.
  • The properties were in the hands of LPA Receivers when he took them on. However, there were a number of mortgage lenders involved, and therefore different LPA Receivers, and without delving into his records he could not tell me which properties were in the hands of LPA Receivers when. And given that this would take effort on his part to mine, he would require payment for providing this data. ... the Editor declined the offer. When the properties came out of receivership, this was due to getting arrears paid off and proving to the LPA Receivers that the properties could be properly managed and that mortgages could be paid.
  • Asked whether when the C&B owned properties came out of LPA Receivership in April 2010 the properties were profitable, or whether the partners had to inject additional monies to make this happen, Patrick Collins stated:

"When the properties came out of receivership, yes this was due to getting arrears paid off and proving to the receivers that the properties could be properly managed and that mortgages could be paid. As a number of properties were with different mortgage companies, and so different receivers, I am not 100% sure how the whole portfolio was managed in terms of payments. I would deal with each house individually and was never involved with paying the mortgages. This is always the responsibility of the landlord, not the agent. There may have been money injected to contribute, but if so I was not aware of this. I would not agree that the properties were profitable in April 2010. Throughout the whole portfolio, the properties were at the stage where they could just make enough money to cover mortgages. However many of the properties were old in terms of decor and furnishings and boilers etc and so every month there were a lot of maintenance charges. Also there was money spent on the houses in order to make them more habitable to be rented out and so there was never a stage where I would class the houses as profitable. Some houses had low mortgages and high rents, some where empty, and others had high mortgages and low rents and so throughout the portfolio, there was never a stage where I would say that over all there was a profit, but more a case of just getting by each month."
This raises a huge question mark over the solvency of C&B at the end of 2009:

  • Liam Collins & David Bone Jnr already had a number of CCJs against them (the appropriate searches have been done).
  • Their property assets were in negative equity, and they were behind in their mortgage payments as well.
  • Even when the properties came out of LPA Receivership in April 2010, rent collected barely covered the mortgages.
So a question must be raised over the commercial valuation the partners placed on their properties, and how this valuation was derived at, because it was this highly inflated valuation that effectively allowed the partners to continue trading and to solicit additional monies through PNs.

  • With regards to deposits, all deposits received from C&B owned property tenants were paid through Patrick Properties and registered with mydeposits.co.uk . Once a tenant moved in, the money was stored in a separate client account held by Patrick Properties, the deposit registered, and the tenant provided a certificate and number. Once Patrick Properties handed over management to Diggs, all deposits were transferred over, or paid back to tenants if they were moving out. According to Patrick Collins, there are no deposits owed to any C&B tenants who rented through Patrick Properties.
  • He estimated that during this 1 year period, occupancy rates were at best around 65%, but at times a lot lower.
  • During this 1 year period, C&B were struggling to pay the mortgages on their properties.
  • After the 1 year period, the properties were passed over to Diggs Lettings, with Loughborough based properties being managed by Rami Hariri. He is not aware if any of C&B's properties were subsequently taken over by Novocastria ... again, this does not gel with signed assured shorthold tenancy agreements found on the Internet (see later).
  • The company charged management fees for managing the properties at 8% a month for each property:

"For charges, all agencies charge between 8% to 15% management fees. Anything lower than that is generally too cheap for the amount of work that needs to be done, any anything higher than that, the landlord will not pay. I am not sure what Novocastria charged but it would have been between 8% and 12% and the same for Diggs, but I imagine they would have charged 8%."

The fees cover the costs to collect rent, advertise and rent properties, and to deal with any maintenance on a monthly basis. All remaining monies were payed to the landlords who were responsible for making any mortgage payments. If a property was not let in a given month, the company got nothing.
  • He has never had any dealings with Novocastria.
Patrick Collins would not provide the following data:

  • Details of debts owed by the company.
  • Supply working e-mail addresses for Mark Black, David Bone Snr & Rachael Bone, as these individuals need to be questioned over C&B properties that they managed and rented out yet never paid any rent monies to C&B for. In an e-mail from Liam Collins on February 22nd 2012 he states:
" I get nothing at all from them (Novocastria Lettings) ever as they are running at a loss most months.".

The Editor tried contacting these 3 individuals through their respective Novocastria Lettings & Novocastria Developments Ltd web-portals but never got a response, and even phoned Rachael Bone who refused to even specify her role in Novocastria Lettings, and its relationship to Novocastria Developments Ltd.
  • When these payments were made, what payment label(s) were tagged against these payments as they would appear on the landlords' bank statements? E.g. "Rent: <property post code>?
  • Were payments made on a per property basis, or in one monthly lump-sum payment to any given landlord (given that a landlord could have multiple properties with you)?
  • In the case of Collins & Bone, into what bank account(s) were the monies you paid to the partners deposited?
  • The Company has, according to Patrick Collins, been closed down since September 2011. Four assured shorthold tenancy agreements have been found, and there are almost certainly others, associated with C&B owned properties and issued by Patrick Properties Management Ltd. as follows:
10th June 2011 -> 30th June 2012, 2 Dronfield Rd.
25th August 2011 -> 30th June 2012, 11 Queen Street
1st July 2011 -> 30th June 2012, 41 Albert Rd.
1st July 2011 -> 30th June 2012, 60 Dundonald Street

All these tenancy agreements showed up under http://img.findaproperty.com/novocastria/Newcastle (e.g. the tenancy agreement for 41 Albert Rd. can be found at http://img.findaproperty.com/novocastria/Newcastle/m110852507.pdf?v=2). Hmmm, Novocastria .... I thought Patrick Collins never had any dealings with Novocastria? And then there is the IFS article "MORE ABOUT THE DIGGS DEBACLE" on 25th April 2012 written by Dom Smith whose daughter co-rented 2 Dronfield Rd during the above period, and who has confirmed that management of 2 Dronfield Rd was taken over by Novocastria Lettings at the end of November 2011. So Patrick Collins LIED when he said he never had any dealings with Novocastria.

The tenancy agreement for 41 Albert Road was particularly interesting because the landlords are shown as "Franklynn Management c/o Patrick Properties" as opposed to C&B. When I brought this to Patrick Collin's attention, he said this was an honest mistake and that nothing should be read into it. Moreover, within 24 hours of me bringing this to his attention, Internet searches for the above four mentioned rental agreements no longer showed up, which is clearly not a coincidence and perhaps an indicator that Patrick Collins has something to hide. The Editor has soft copies of all four of these rental agreements, and will make available on request.
When Patrick Collins was asked if his company had closed down in September 2011 who was collecting the rental monies from these properties if not him, he simply stated:
" I can not advise who has been managing the property since then."

That, quite frankly, just will not do! Here is Patrick Collins running a company with debts, and he cannot remember what happened to properties that were providing a steady income stream all the through to end June 2012?

It strikes me as rather suspicious that after managing C&B properties for nearly 9 months, Patrick Collins formed a limited company only to stop business one year later with debts - one could be forgiven for thinking that the sole motive for forming Patrick Properties Management Ltd was to bury debt. And as part of what business entity was Patrick Collins managing C&B properties in the period December 2009 through to 3rd September 2010 when Patrick Properties Management Ltd was incorporated, and have all rental monies owed to C&B for this period been paid?

The Editor

Wednesday 13 June 2012

New OR appointed - submit criminal allegations now!

Following on from the blog article "criminal allegations for Official Receiver investigation" ...

A new Official Receiver has now been appointed in Liverpool, Martin Faulkner, who will handle the bankruptcies of both Liam Collins & David Bone Jnr. David Bone's interview with the Official Receiver is set for the 26th June in Liverpool - the date for Liam Collin's interview has not yet been set. It would be very beneficial for the Official Receiver to have as much information from investors as possible regarding alleged criminal activities and supporting evidence BEFORE these interviews take place. As such, you are now formally encouraged to submit this information to Martin Faulkner (see below for complete contact details).
Martin Faulkner has requested that all e-mails from creditors specify in the subject title "Collins & Bone Partnership", and contain the following information content:

Full name
Postal Address
Amount of debt (PN's are not necessary at this point)
A statement of any alleged criminal charges
Links to blogs, etc.
Attach any supporting documents to back up claims

His e-mail address is martin.faulkner@insolvency.gsi.gov.uk, and his postal address is:

Martin Faulkner
Official Receiver's Office
2nd Floor
Cunard Building
Pier Head
Liverpool L3 1DS

Martin Faulkner's direct contact number is 0151-243-7859, though he is often away from his desk. If he doesn't answer, the case clerk for the David Bone case is Miss Wimpenny (Collins's case clerk not designated yet) who can be contacted on 0151-236-9131.

The Editor

Thursday 7 June 2012

criminal allegations for Official Receiver investigation

The partners wanted everyone to sign 5 year PNs ... they lost that batlle.
The partners wanted to go down the IVA route ... they lost that battle because of the position taken by Mortgage Express, and the expense of setting up an IVA.
The partners claim that they have committed no crimes, that they are just bad businessmen ... if there is any justice in this world, this is another battle that they will loose!

One of the main purposes of this blog was to hold the partners to account, and that includes making them answerable to allegations of criminal activity. Now that the partners have been made personally bankrupt, it is the job of the Official Receiver to investigate all criminal allegations.

Lee Hall is an Insolvency Examiner who works for the Official Receiver and is the current point of contact for dealing with the affairs of Liam Collins. However, it is likely that Liam Collin's file will be assigned to the Official Receivers office in Liverpool in mid-June so that the bankruptcies of both partners can be handled by the same Official Receiver. I have attached below the e-mail exchange I have had with Lee Hall, and I will update this blog entry as and when the assigned Official Receiver is known, along with full contact details.

So, this is a heads-up to investors who wish to lodge allegations of criminal activity to start putting pen to paper/fingers to the keyboard to document the criminal allegations in your particular investment case, along with all the supporting evidence, and be ready to send this into the Official Receiver.

The Editor



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lee.Hall <Lee.Hall@insolvency.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:57 AM
Subject: RE: Liam James Collins: allegations of criminal activity


Dear <The Editor>,

Thank you for your email regarding the trading activities of Liam James Collins.  I should point out that I am not actually the Official Receiver, I am an Insolvency Examiner who works for the Official Receiver, but I am indeed the current contact dealing with the case of Liam Collins.

The current position with Mr Collins’ bankruptcy is that joint trustees have been appointed do deal with Mr Collin’s assets.  The trustees are David Michael Clements and Adrian Hyde of Chantrey Vellacott DFK, Prospect House, 58 Queens Road, Reading, RG1 4RP – Tel (0118)9524700.  They have been appointed to deal with Mr Collins’ assets but the investigation work will continue to be dealt with by the Official Receiver’s office.

Whilst I am the current contact, the case is about to be transferred to the Official Receiver’s Office in Liverpool so that it can be consolidated with the bankruptcy of David Bone, with whom Mr Collins traded in partnership.  It will be advantageous for both cases to be consolidated so that all of the information can be processed by one Official Receiver’s office.  The allegations to which you have referred will definitely be of interest to the Examiner who deals with the bankruptcies but as yet I cannot provide you with the exact contact details.  I have been asked to ring the Liverpool office on 11th June to discuss the transfer of Mr Collin’s case, so I will know more after that date.  In the meantime, I will try to answer your questions;

  1. There is no prescribed timeframe for the allegations to be lodged, but it would definitely be of benefit to the Examiner to have this information before interviewing Mr Collins and Mr Bone so that those areas of concern could be addressed.
  2. Any correspondence on the case will be available to whoever is dealing with the case at that time.  The transfer of the file will not affect this.
  3. There is no prescribed template for reporting allegations.
  4. I will notify you when the case has been transferred so that you have the up to date contact details to lodge the allegations.
  5. You can send correspondence by letter or email (Word, Excel, PDF, TIFF files are all acceptable) once I have updated you after the transfer of the case.

I hope that I have covered all of your points so far, but if you need anything else from me in the meantime, please call or email me.

Regards,

Lee Hall
Insolvency Examiner | The Insolvency Service | lee.hall@insolvency.gsi.gov.uk | Official Receiver's Office, 1st Floor, Pandon Bank, Newcastle, NE1 2JQ | (0191)2604625 | www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency


From: The Editor
Sent: 06 June
To: Lee.Hall

Subject: Liam James Collins: allegations of criminal activity

Hi Lee,


I am an investor, or should I say, dis-investor with the Collins & Bone Partnership, and editor of the blog www.collins-and-bone.blogspot.com. I understand from Sally George that you are currently the Official Receiver in the case of the personal bankruptcy of Liam James Collins, one of the partners.

A good number of investors have criminal allegations that they wish to levy against the partners, and which need to be investigated by the Official Receiver. I would like to put up an article on the aforementioned blog telling investors the process that needs to be followed to get these allegations formalised with the OR. If polling of investors for allegations of criminal activity is something that you will automatically do as part of your activities once you have the contact details of all of the investors, then of course I do not need to do this. Otherwise, can you please answer the following questions and supply any other information that might be useful to investors wrt formalising their allegations:

  • in what timeframe should allegations be lodged with the OR?
  • if allegations are sent to you, will these automatically to be tagged to the case file even if the OR dealing with the case subsequently changes/has changed?
  • is there a particular template that needs to be followed for reporting allegations?
  • to where/whom should the allegations be sent?
  • what media formats are acceptable for reporting allegations?
The Editor

Thursday 17 May 2012

E-mails from Action For Debt

Investors may have received e-mails today (May 17th) from Marian Cox at Action For Debt (http://www.actionfordebt.com/) requesting personal data on the basis that they have a "limited spread sheet to work off" from Liam Collins, and that without this information the Official Receivers will not be able to contact you with their findings or be able tell you if there is a creditors meeting. Her e-mail contains an incorrect date of bankruptcy for Liam Collins, and in my case divulged other investors' e-mail addresses i.e. wholly unprofessional. Liam Collins has apparently asked Action For Debt for help in completing certain paperwork required for the Official Receivers investigations. However, the information they are requesting (mailing address) the partners should be able to readily supply, since this data is minimally on the PNs that they issued. The Editor's response to Action For Debt's request, as well as the advice to investors, is not to supply any personal data until such a time as the partners have sent an e-mail to all investors in which they state:
  • Why the partners cannot supply the required data themselves. If investor data has been lost, what has happened to it, and when & why did it happen?
  • The role that Action For Debt is fulfilling on their behalf.
The Editor

PS. The above blog texts were additionally e-mailed to Liam Collins, and "The Board" members Joe Sinagoga & Robert Wakefield, today (May 17th).

Tuesday 15 May 2012

Liam's 15th May 2012 e-mail to investors

You will all have seen the latest drivel to come from Liam Collins as to why he has now given up on an IVA proposal ... ANS IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ANTI_IVA GROUP. If you read this blog posting in conjunction with the "Britain's Got Talent" blog posting, I am sure that even the most naive C&B investor will be able to put 2 & 2 together, and see the blatant lies that are bing told to investors.

It is also worth mentioning that at the time McCambridge Duffy LLP gave up on C&B, they had yet to see up-to-date cash-flows and accounts, this from Michael Peoples:

"We did not receive up to date cashflows or accounts but we were advised that the rentals were generating sufficient profits to fund the proposals we were discussing. We would have wanted more detail before finalising any documents such as accounts, projections, profit and loss accounts but again it became irrelevant as we never progressed with the IVA."

The Editor

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ewart tempest
Date: Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:22 AM
Subject: RE: May 15th e-mail from Liam Collins to all investors
To: collinsandbone@hotmail.co.uk
Cc:


Liam,

I don't expect you to forward the texts below to all investors, which is no matter as it will go up on the blog in due course in any case. Let's just set a few things straight:
  • The trustee that we, the anti-IVA group, would like to see appointed, is independent - he has no associations whatsoever with the David Bone Jnr or yourself. He does not at this point in time have access to any of the partnership's financial data, so no statement can be made about what the outcome of the trustee's activities will be.
  • The anti-IVA group has NEVER blocked the formulation of an IVA proposal, and we have NEVER interfered in the activities of McCambridge Duffy LLP in trying to get an IVA proposal together - if you have evidence to the contrary, make it available to investors! In fact, the anti-IVA group has nothing to loose in seeing an IVA proposal put forward. After all, the voting block that the anti-IVA group represents is only relevant when an IVA proposal is on the table.
  • I asked Michael Peoples this morning to specifically comment on your following statement:
"Michael Peoples who was going to carry out the IVA told David and I personally that the major reason why they dropped the case was because of the hostility of the opposition."

and this is what he came back with:

From: Michael Peoples <mpeoples@mccambridgeduffy.com>
Date: Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:08 AM
Subject: Re:
To: ewart tempest

Hi Ewart,

To be fair I cannot add anything to what I have already said. I did receive correspondence from the Georges which I replied to and I was advised that there was a number of people hostile to the Collins/Bone partnership but I personally have received nothing untoward. I have received hostility in the past as it is not unusual for creditors to effectively 'shoot the messenger' but this is highly rare and normally just someone letting off steam.

When speaking of hostile creditors in an IVA scenario we are referring to those who have indicated rejection of the arrangement and not people threatening to come round and break my legs! Had 'hostile' creditors exceeded 25% of the overall creditor amount any IVA would have been rejected but we never actually did the sums. However, the judge was given indications that there was sufficient supporters to outvote the rejections and granted the initial adjournment on that basis.

In summation, had I received confirmation from MX that they would not appoint LPA receivers I would have drafted the IVA documents. Often even 'hostile' creditors accept proposals when they see the alternative is usually zero and I would have put the proposals to a vote. The proposals could have been modified or changed at any meeting while safeguards could have been put in place protecting all concerned but since MX have only ever said they would 'consider' any proposal and we have been given no assurances that their policies would be changed we could not proceed.

Kind Regards,

Michael.

Manager - Self Employed Department
McCambridge Duffy Telephone:         028 7137 7321 Fax:                  028 7130 8025 E-mail:              mpeoples@mccambridgeduffy.com Web:                 http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com/    


----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 1:40 PM
Subject: Fwd:

Hi Michael,

Sorry to bother you again, I thought we were done .... but then this e-mail just in from Liam Collins, specifically the texts below that I have bolded in red. Liam Collins claims that you personally told the partners that the major reason your firm dropped the case was due to hostility from the opposition.
  • Who was hostility received from? The Georges? Alastair MacLean? Tim Clift? The press? Who?
  • What was the nature of this hostility? Are there any e-mails I should be aware of?
Ewart
  • It is quite clear from the information that we have received from McCambridge Duffy LLP that the impediment to any IVA proposal is Mortgage Express. It may seem convenient to you to blame the anti-IVA group for your own selfish reasons, but the truth is there for all investors to see.
  • The members of the anti-IVA group are not closed to the idea of an IVA proposal, so long as the percentage returns on the original investment are substantial and GUARANTEED. So far you have failed to make available any financial data, and merely tried to paint the anti-IVA group as a small splinter-group of disgruntled investors. How you think doing this helps you get an IVA proposal passed is a puzzle. There is only one way to engage the anti-IVA group, and that is through the release of financial data to all investors. You claimed in your e-mail to investors on May 9th that:
"We have it in writing that Mortgage Express would have considered an IVA (if it made commercial sense), and we had a proposal which most certainly did."

So what is the proposal, and where is the financial data to back it up? Whether you have managed to wrap it up in an IVA proposal at this stage is irrelevant.

Ewart


On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Liam Collins <collinsandbone@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Investors,

Thank you for those who have written to us to offer your support it is much appreciated. Just to let you all know where we stand at present. I am officially bankrupt and I am currently having to fill in a great deal of information about everything which has happened over the last 5 years. I am working with an advisor who is helping me to do this and after this we have to hand this to the official receiver.  The official receiver will decide if there is merit in handing the estate to a trustee for the sale of all assets. As you know there is no equity in the overall portfolio so it is unlikely that a trustee would be appointed after all there has to be something in it for the trustee. So it is likely the estate will stay with the official receivers and they will decide the best course of action for the estate.  They will also leave no stone unturned with what has happened and why it has happened. 

I know the Georges and Ewart Tempest have won their battle to bankrupt me and Davey at the end of this month and that their mission does not end here. For their information we are more than happy to work with all authorities and to answer all questions asked.  

The Georges are already trying to appoint their own "neutral" trustee. If enough of you support this then perhaps they will succeed. I can only hope that if they achieve this they keep the assets for all investors and not just for themselves. I have my own opinions of what will happen in that situation. 

To clear a few points up so that you are all clear. Michael Peoples who was going to carry out the IVA told David and I personally that the major reason why they dropped the case was because of the hostility of the opposition. Michael wrote a letter recently stating that without confirmation from MX that they would not put all the properties into LPA receivership there would be little commercial incentive to embark on the paperwork to put one together. The reality is that MX had confirmed in writing to us that they would consider an IVA but only after seeing the proposal. So as you can see we had a catch 22. Michael would not do the IVA written offer to you all due to hostility and MX would not say for sure  if they would  allow the properties to go into an IVA without seeing the written offer. 

We can still look for a new IVA practitioner who will take the case on now that the press have ran their stories and it is unlikely they will cover any more as it has been done now. However any IVA practitioner taking on the case now to over rule my bankruptcy will simply be bombarded by hostility from the George's and Ewart making it a total waste of time. 

For that reason we will not be wasting anyone's time any more with this. The George's and Ewart who now have about 40 Investors supporting them will never allow us to enter into one.  If they would we would certainly spend as long as it takes to do so. 

For most of you but not all of you I sold you this investment. David and myself take some of the blame for why the buy to let model which worked 30 times between 2002 and 2008 would not work from 2008 to 2012. We also take some of the blame for why the buy to sell model which worked 75 times between 2008 and 2011 but would not work between 2011 and 2012. There are many factors why this has not worked. None of our investors can be blamed for being greedy or for investing. It had worked many times for us and other investors and none of us had any reason to believe it would not work going forward. Many things have changed which we could not have predicted. I feel we have acted with integrity and honesty in dealing with the situation and I hope people will understand we have done everything we can to prevent this. 

Had we thought for any reason along the way that what we were doing would not work we would have looked to protect our assets and there are many ways we could have done this. Instead we are now losing all of our assets and will be left with nothing at all. I hope those who invested are not in the same position. 

We are deeply sorry for what has happened and we will always continue to become successful in something so that we can one day come back to repay something if not all back to you. Other people have done this before and there is no shortage of will at this side.  I can only guess that whatever we try to do in the near future may well be ruined by the Georges regardless of what we try.

My advice at this stage for what it is worth is to let the official receiver decide what is best and to not support the Georges in trying to appoint their own trustee. 

We will keep in touch with you over the coming weeks/ months as you never know the George's might change their mind and support the idea of keeping the houses for all of you and focus on that rather than focussing on who is to blame. 

Kind Regards


Liam Collins



Wednesday 9 May 2012

Britain's Got Talent

... but alas, in the case of Liam Collins, not for telling the truth. He cannot even tell the simple truth of why the IVA practitioner pulled out.

Both this blog and the IFS blog have always posted informative and accurate articles - it is one of the reasons why the editors have never had to modify an article due to a factual error, and we aim to keep it that way. Alas, this cannot be said for statements from the partners, or "the Board" members. Liam Collins' e-mail to investors minutes before his bankruptcy hearing this morning, and attached below in all its "glory", is testament to the disinformation and lies that he espouses to, and I feel compelled to point out all the erroneous statements for the benefit/education of all investors:


  • Liam Collins: "The IVA company we had engaged, pulled out last Wednesday due to 'extreme hostility' from the George's as well as the other handful of people we have going against us. Their concern was that there had been press threats and it was too much of a risk for their company. This has not left us enough time to engage another firm (as you know, we struggled to get anyone to agree to take the case on initially)."
Editor: UNTRUE! The IVA company in question was McCambridge Duffy LLP - not many investors will have known that. With the exception of a personal "olive branch" e-mail from Liam Collins to Sally, Jasmine and myself  on March 30th which we agreed not to publish, we have received no e-mails from the partners until the one sent today i.e. we had received no e-mails wrt IVA proposal progress for many weeks. So on 26th April Sally & Jasmine sent an e-mail to Michael Peoples at McCambridge Duffy LLP to find out what the status of the IVA proposal was - their e-mail, and the response from Michael Peoples, is below. As you can see, all very polite and professional, just as it should be: 

----- Original Message -----
From: IRN
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:03 AM
Subject: Collins & Bone Partnership

Dear Mr Peoples,

We are creditors with the above partnership and have been wondering whether there is any news about the development of an IVA for Liam Collins and David Bone, Jr.  We have heard nothing from the partners for over a month and neither has the lawyer, Tim Clift, nor have any of the investors with whom we are in touch.

We are asking you directly rather than contacting the partners because we are unable to trust a word they say or write regarding the state of their finances.
 
Yours sincerely 
SALLY and JASMINE GEORGE



Dear Mr and Mrs George,

Unfortunately, I cannot answer any specifics but I can confirm that at this time we have not drafted any IVA proposal for the Collins and Bone partnership. If we do draft a proposal it will be circulated in the near future but there is no certainty that this will happen.

I will try and see if I have authority to discuss any further and will revert to you once I have spoken to the partners.

Kind Regards,
Michael.
Michael Peoples
Manager - Self Employed Department
McCambridge Duffy
Telephone:         028 7137 7321
Fax:                  028 7130 8025
E-mail:              mpeoples@mccambridgeduffy.com


With the exception of a telephone call from Tim Clift to McCambridge Duffy LLP the morning before the hearing to find out the status of the proposed IVA (the receptionist informed Tim Clift that they were no longer instructed by Collins & Bone), this is the full extent of the anti-IVA group's interactions with them.
So I sent an e-mail to Michael Peoples to have him comment on Liam's statement, and this is what he came back with:


Date: Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: Why did McCambridge Duffy pull out of C&B IVA proposal?
To: ewart tempest <ewart.tempest@gmail.com>

Dear Mr Ewart,

 A number of people contacted ourselves and Mr Chris Jary who helped Liam get the first adjournment making various accusations. While this may indeed be a factor in deciding whether to proceed with the IVA, there was also an issue with Mortgage Express who were the main lender to Collins/Bone. It is their policy to appoint LPA receivers if a landlord enters an IVA and this would have caused any IVAs to collapse. We spoke to them on a number of occasions and they would not say for definite that they would not appoint LPAs.

This was a huge factor in being unable to proceed as we could not draft proposals and recommend them to creditors knowing that Mortgage Express could pull the plug immediately afterwards. They did say they would refer the case to their risk team and hopefully it would be looked favourably upon, but that answer was not enough to justify the work and expense involved in drafting IVAs.

 I hope this information is helpful but should you require anything further please give me a call.

 Kind Regards,

 Michael Peoples.

Michael Peoples     
Manager - Self Employed Department

McCambridge Duffy
Telephone:         028 7137 7321
Fax:                  028 7130 8025
E-mail:              mpeoples@mccambridgeduffy.com
Web:                 http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com/     



----- Original Message -----

Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:40 AM
Subject: Why did McCambridge Duffy pull out of C&B IVA proposal?

Dear Mr Peoples,

Liam Collins, just before going into his personal bankruptcy hearing this morning (May 9th) in Newcastle Upon Tyne posted an e-mail to investors in which he stated the following:

"The IVA company we had engaged, pulled out last Wednesday due to 'extreme hostility' from the George's as well as the other handful of people we have going against us. Their concern was that there had been press threats and it was too much of a risk for their company."

McCambridge Duffy is "The IVA company" mentioned above. Can you comment on the above statement and the nature of the "extreme hostility" your firm was at the receiving end of from the George's/others.

Ewart (a major Collins & Bone Partnership investor)


  • Liam Collins: "We had overwhelming support in favour of an IVA, comfortably over the 75% needed, and for all those who supported us in this, we are desperately sorry that it has now come to this. We never ever wanted any of this to happen the way it has, and we are so, so sorry."

Editor: UNTRUE! Liam Collins is evidently not familiar with even the basics of IVAs. When voting on an IVA proposal it does not matter how many investors would vote in favour of it, but the percentage of the debt that these investors represent. If this percentage is less than 75% of the total debt of those who voted, the IVA proposal fails. We don't know the actual number of investors but even so they certainly don't have 87% of the investors on their side; at the most, they have up to 60% of the total debt. So the partners never had any chance of passing an IVA proposal unless the percentage return on investment was sizeable and guaranteed i.e. an incentive for anti-IVA members to change sides. The approach taken by the bloggers during the past 5-6 weeks has been to take a well-deserved rest after all the investigative work of the past few months, and to see what proposal if any the partners put forward ... but nothing materialised.


  • Liam Collins: "One of Sally and Jasmine George's main supporters has told us 'we have a person ready to take control of the portfolio should you go bankrupt', I guess we will see if this is possible for them, and whether they are going to hold them in trust for the other investors as an IVA would, only time will tell."

Editor: UNTRUE! This mis-information has already been addressed in the blog article "OK, who squealed? Liam now knows ...". Tim Clift does however have a bankruptcy trustee whom many creditors would like to see approved by the Official Receiver, someone who is totally unconnected with any of the partners, their respective families, or friends. A person who is both an experienced IVA practitioner and bankruptcy trustee.

To Liam Collins I say, if you claim to have a proposal which makes commercial sense, put it on the table along with all the backing data. After all, if it is commercially viable you should have no problem getting an IVA proposal together. Stop blaming others for your own failures!



The Editor







From: Liam Collins <collinsandbone@hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:51 AM
Subject: Bankruptcy Hearing
To:


Dear all,

As you are aware we have a hearing today at 11am at Newcastle Court. Unfortunately, I will now be made bankrupt at this hearing.

The IVA company we had engaged, pulled out last Wednesday due to 'extreme hostility' from the George's as well as the other handful of people we have going against us. Their concern was that there had been press threats and it was too much of a risk for their company. This has not left us enough time to engage another firm (as you know, we struggled to get anyone to agree to take the case on initially). 

We had overwhelming support in favour of an IVA, comfortably over the 75% needed, and for all those who supported us in this, we are desperately sorry that it has now come to this. We never ever wanted any of this to happen the way it has, and we are so, so sorry.

I will be confirmed bankrupt at 11am, Davey has a hearing on 31st May where that result is also now a formality.

We do have a 6 week window to get an IVA in place even after we have been made bankrupt (as in we have 6 weeks for an IVA to over-turn today's ruling), and we will be doing all we can to get this in place.

I'm not sure if its worth those supporting the IVA contacting the original firm who were taking it on to show how much support we have, we will be in touch regarding this.

It has all come as a bit of a shock, and we have worked up until last night to try to turn this around, but we have been unable to.

We have it in writing that Mortgage Express would have considered an IVA (if it made commercial sense), and we had a proposal which most certainly did. We also have it in writing that upon bankruptcy the properties will all be placed into LPA receivership, and, as mentioned previously, it only takes a google search of 'mortgage express LPA' to see what will result from that.

One of Sally and Jasmine George's main supporters has told us 'we have a person ready to take control of the portfolio should you go bankrupt', I guess we will see if this is possible for them, and whether they are going to hold them in trust for the other investors as an IVA would, only time will tell.

I cant express how sorry we are enough, I guess it would, at this stage appear we have lost the fight for the IVA, we will continue over the next 6 weeks to try to get another in place, but with the hostility shown towards the last company spoiling any chance we had, I'm not sure how far we will get with this action.

I'm not sure what else to say at this point other than sorry, and that we will continue to work to get an IVA in place over the coming weeks.

Thanks again for all of the support we have received, its been massively appreciated,

Liam.